The 13th Finance Commission, constituted under the chairmanship of Dr. Vijay Kelkar, was tasked with recommending principles governing the distribution of financial resources between the Union and the States in India for the period spanning 2010-2015. Its recommendations aimed to enhance fiscal federalism, improve the efficiency of public spending, and address developmental imbalances across states.
A central aspect of the Commission’s guidelines was its formula for vertical tax devolution, which determined the percentage of the divisible pool of central taxes allocated to states. The 13th Finance Commission recommended a significant increase in this share to 32%, up from 30.5% recommended by its predecessor. This enhanced fiscal autonomy for states, enabling them to finance their developmental priorities more effectively.
To determine the inter-state distribution of these funds, the Commission adopted a multi-faceted approach, considering various factors that reflected states’ needs, fiscal capacity, and performance. The criteria included: population (25%), fiscal discipline (17.5%), income distance (47.5%), area (10%), and forest and ecology (5%). The considerable weightage given to income distance aimed to address regional disparities by allocating more resources to states with lower per capita income.
A key innovation was the introduction of the “fiscal discipline” criterion, rewarding states for prudent financial management, debt reduction, and revenue mobilization. This incentivized states to improve their fiscal performance and reduce reliance on central grants. The “forest and ecology” criterion recognized the role of states in preserving natural resources and encouraged environmental stewardship.
Beyond tax devolution, the Commission also made significant recommendations concerning grants to states. These included grants for local bodies (Panchayats and Municipalities), special area needs, and disaster management. The grants for local bodies were particularly noteworthy, intended to strengthen local governance and enhance the delivery of essential services at the grassroots level.
The 13th Finance Commission emphasized the importance of improving the quality of public expenditure. It recommended that states prioritize investments in critical sectors such as education, health, and infrastructure. It also advocated for better monitoring and evaluation of government programs to ensure their effectiveness and accountability. The Commission stressed the need for reforms in public financial management, including the adoption of accrual-based accounting and improved budget transparency.
Furthermore, the Commission addressed the issue of state-level debt sustainability. It recommended a comprehensive debt restructuring package for states to reduce their debt burden and improve their fiscal health. It also emphasized the importance of fiscal consolidation and sustainable debt management practices.
In conclusion, the 13th Finance Commission’s guidelines played a crucial role in shaping India’s fiscal landscape during 2010-2015. Its recommendations aimed to enhance fiscal federalism, promote equitable development, and improve the efficiency of public spending. While some states expressed concerns regarding certain aspects of the recommendations, the Commission’s overall contribution to strengthening the financial relations between the Union and the States was widely acknowledged.