Cognitive-Process Theory (CPT) in behavioral finance delves into the mental shortcuts and biases that individuals use when making financial decisions. Unlike traditional finance, which assumes rational actors, CPT acknowledges that human cognition is often flawed and prone to systematic errors.
A core tenet of CPT is that our brains employ heuristics, simplified rules of thumb, to process information quickly and efficiently. While heuristics can be helpful in navigating complex situations, they can also lead to suboptimal investment choices. One prominent example is the availability heuristic, where individuals overestimate the likelihood of events that are easily recalled or emotionally salient, like plane crashes or vivid news stories about specific stock market losses. This can lead to overreacting to negative news and selling assets at inopportune times.
Another significant cognitive bias explored by CPT is representativeness. This bias leads individuals to judge the probability of an event based on how similar it is to a stereotype or a previously observed pattern. For instance, an investor might believe a small company is more likely to be a high-growth stock just because it reminds them of a successful tech startup they read about. This can result in ignoring crucial fundamental analysis and overvaluing certain companies.
Anchoring bias is also a key consideration. This bias describes the tendency to rely heavily on the first piece of information received (the “anchor”) when making subsequent judgments, even if that information is irrelevant or inaccurate. For example, investors might fixate on a stock’s initial offering price, even if market conditions have drastically changed since then, and use it as a reference point when making buying or selling decisions.
Framing effects highlight how the way information is presented can significantly influence decision-making. People react differently to the same choice depending on whether it is framed as a gain or a loss. Investors may be more willing to take risks to avoid a loss than they are to secure an equivalent gain, leading to irrational risk-taking behavior. For example, a potential investment opportunity framed as “preserving capital” is viewed differently than the same investment framed as an opportunity to “grow wealth.”
CPT also considers mental accounting, where individuals compartmentalize their money into separate mental accounts, treating each account differently. This can lead to irrational investment decisions, such as holding onto losing investments in one account while simultaneously seeking higher returns in another. This fragmentation of assets prevents investors from making holistic, optimal financial choices.
Understanding CPT and its associated biases is crucial for investors and financial advisors alike. By recognizing the potential for cognitive errors, individuals can take steps to mitigate their impact. Strategies such as developing a well-defined investment plan, seeking independent advice, and using decision-making tools can help counteract the influence of biases and promote more rational financial outcomes. By acknowledging the psychological dimensions of investing, CPT provides a valuable framework for improving financial decision-making and achieving long-term financial success.